Easily manage any transfer flow without writing scripts or code, and onboard workloads and partners effortlessly.
We obsess about security, compliance, reliability, and performance so your critical business processes just work every time. That doesn't mean you cannot benefit from using something other than xcopy however.6,000+ companies trust to automate and secure business critical transfers. Also the Robocopy option /NP (No Progress) saves you 0 time. This is by no means an exhaustive test, but just throwing a quick real world scenario at some of the more popular tools in this genre shows that your pretty safe sticking with either xcopy or Robocopy (from a performance standpoint only). fastcopy.exe /auto_close G:\folder1 /to=I:\folder2) TeraCopy.exe Copy G:\folder1\ I:\folder2\)įastcopy 60 secs (ex. fastcopy.exe /auto_close G:\folder1 /to=I:\folder2)įiles/directoies: 1,087,180,800 bytes (1.01 GB), 27 files/8 directories copied to external USB disk. TeraCopy.exe Copy G:\folder1\ I:\folder2\)įastcopy 6 secs (ex. fastcopy.exe /auto_close G:\folder1 /to=I:\folder2)įiles: 45,039,616bytes (42.9MB) 5 random files copied to external usb disk copy 6 secs (ex. TeraCopy.exe Copy G:\folder1\ I:\folder2\)įastcopy 38 secs (ex.
fastcopy.exe /auto_close G:\folder1 /to=G:\folder2)įile: 732,909,568 bytes (698 MB), 1 ISO file copied to external USB disk. TeraCopy.exe Copy G:\folder1\ G:\folder2\)įastcopy 19 secs (ex. After a couple of passes here are the averages from the tools I played with:įile: 732,909,568 bytes (698 MB), 1 ISO file copied to different directory on the same internal disk. PowerShell was used to capture the start and stop times. No special setup was done (make up your own mind if that invalidates/validates the test), only to input the command into a batch file to execute.
All copies were performed between a internal 7200 RPM Sata II disk and an external USB 2.0 drive or on the same internal drive itself where indicated. I ran through a couple of tests on a Windows Vista 64-bit SP2 box to do some comparisons. From a performance standpoint only, xcopy or robocopy will give you similar results.
0 kommentar(er)
